DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SoM
Docket No: 5753-13
31 October 2014
e
ar
jear ay
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and consider your application on its merits. A
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
28 October 2014. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures wapplicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 8 December 1986. On 13 August 1987, you were diagnosed
with a personality disorder. You were counseled regarding your
medical condition and subsequentiy notified of pending
administrative separation by reason of convenience of the
government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. After
being afforded all of your procedural rights, the separation
authority directed that you receive a general discharge. You
were so discharged on 17 November 1987. On 21 December 1988,
the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) recommended that your
characterization of service be changed to honorable. However,
the President of the NDRB did not concur with the finding and
recommendations of the Board and forwarded your case to the
Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) for final review. On 6 October
1988, SECNAV concurred with the President of the NDRB, that
relief in your case was not warranted. Ha Stated, in part, that
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Directer:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02567-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 January 1987. Subsequently, you received two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11716-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09
You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07743-98
In the performance evaluation for You were Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder. evaluations and the psychologist's opinion that you could be at risk to harm yourself or others were sufficient to support the decision not to recommend you for reenlistment and to assign you an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09688-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08452-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 October 1986. You received a second nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1420 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient ‘ro establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04338-01
When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. The record reflects that you received nonjudicial conducted on 5 February 1988, diagnosed you with a A psychiatric At that time you were assigned Since you have been treated no differently than Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07614-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02385-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 33 February 2010. Documentary ‘al considered by the Board consisted of your application, ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...